A high school diploma plays an important role in getting a good job. There are many who have excellent skills for a well-paid job but this has been denied to them just because they don't have a high school diploma. If you have had to discontinue your school education for some reason you need not worry any more. The good news is that you can pursue your diploma through distance learning system. Today there are thousands of people in the U.S. pursuing their senior high school education from home while they continue to work and earn a living.

Distance education is specially designed for people who are eager to receive higher education and climb up the social ladder but are unable to attend school or college due to family commitments or other responsibilities. In today's competitive world you have to prove your worth for your survival in the professional world and therefore you should not lag behind due to not possessing a high school diploma. Now you must be curious to know how to go about joining a distance education program for earning your high school diploma.

To enroll for a distance education program you should be at least 16 years of age. You shouldn't be a regular student in a high school. Before enrolling for a high school diploma distance education it is better to do some research and find out the best institution in your area-offering enrollment. In whichever part of the country you may be living, there are several reputed online and distance learning centers. Make thorough inquiries via phone or visit them personally to know the relevant terms and the expenses involved. Be careful that you don't land up in one of those fake centers notorious for swindling hundreds of dollars out of prospective diploma seekers like you. Carefully check if the distance-learning center is recognized by the state education department. Preferably choose a center that enjoys a certain amount of reputation in the job market.

Distance learning lets you study at your own pace in the comfort of your own home. The best thing about a distance-learning program is that you don't have to face the rowdy crowd of senior high school students and instead can pursue your studies in the privacy of your sweet home. In case you are a working person and feel shy about being a student at a late age be sure that nobody will come to know about it as you wouldn't be attending a regular school. Even while working to earn money you can spare some time daily for your diploma studies. In fact, you will have the advantage of making your own timetable and study accordingly. It's absolutely up to you how much time you want to devote to your studies.

Every distance-learning center will have its own way of conducting the course and exam pattern. Most of the centers will mail you the study material regularly and give you a list of books to refer to for an in-depth study. You may also have to submit some assignments on a regular basis for which you will be given grades. At the end of the course period you will either have to take an online exam or a written exam at one of the authorized centers. In this way, you can complete your diploma even while continuing to work for a living.

After receiving your high school diploma you would be in a better position to get a decent job as you might also have simultaneously gained some work experience. You never know you might just earn a promotion in your current job of which you probably always dreamed but couldn't succeed without a diploma.

A high school diploma can do wonders for your career. You will be amazed to see new job offers coming your way. It is never too late to realize the value of a diploma and enroll yourself at a recognized distance-learning center. Possessing the document called High School Diploma will help you move up the career ladder. So if you have been toying with the idea of getting a school diploma don't wait any more and plunge into action.

If you have videoconference capabilities, your class can participate in virtual field trips to the Buffalo Museum of Science without even leaving your building. Let the education department bring some of the wonders of the natural world to your classroom via a videoconference. When the videoconference is over, take formal steps to evaluate what could be done to improve the next one. Using the barn owl as a videoconference focus during a class dissection of owl pellets makes science come alive! Students "tou'can" journey through the wilds of the zoo via a videoconference educational program.

We will discuss how inexpensive tools (a high quality video camera and computer) and a massive amount of new distribution platforms (e.g. The new parameter-based keyframe support for frame-by-frame color correction gives users the tools to quickly enhance the quality of their video productions. It requires a very good connection to get these videos to run properly, however you get a larger video and a better quality picture. WB provides high end film & interactive media solutions including broadcast quality programs, tv commercials, training videos, music videos, 2D and 3D animation. Sony does a great job of making high end camcorders with excellent video quality, as the HC1 showed us.

No, the video quality is not great, and no, there are few compelling features. The quality is great for porting out a dvd / itunes video to the TV. Otherwise it's well built, can't comment on quality, i assume its good, not hard to do DVI-S-video. Total Training produces high quality, award-winning video tutorials to get you up to speed fast. The video quality is excellent and I love the interface. Before this Disney stuff, its one of the best quality video on the web that I've seen. The subjective video quality of a video processing system may be evaluated as follows: Choose the video sequences (the SRC) to use for testing.

The price is inexpensive for someone who really wants to be good at making videos and movies. It maps out, step by step, a sure-fire approach to successful movie making

including home videos, tutorials, and even short features. With flexible timeline and storyboard modes, an adjustable user interface and many auto processes, you'll be making videos and discs in no time! Making sound and video work in shared buildings. http://www.conference-teleconferencing.info/video/

Every brilliant student has a dream to go abroad for study in eminent universities like oxford and Cambridge, but due to financial want they have to change their decision. But it will not so more now, now the student even, from poor families can attain higher education in eminent universities and colleges. Unemployed student loans are given to the students in four types. Out of them one is known as, government student loan these loans, are given by government education department.

The second is known as parent student loan that is provided to the parent of the loan aspirant. Private loans are provided by the banks, lenders etc. out of many loans one is known with the name of student unemployed loans. These loans are provided by the private loan lenders on easy terms and conditions. The terms and conditions are as follow – an applicant should be adult of 18 years. Applicant should have checking account for transaction. Applicant should have resident proof. These all are the basic requirements for availing loan. If applicant has the ability to meet this entire requirement, he can be given the loan to continue his study.

Unemployed student loans give the amount to the student in the form of secured loans and unsecured loans. If the student has some assets, he can get the loan in secured form on suitable interest rates. While in unsecured the student has to pay additional rate of interest. The loan amount and repayment period is also differed in both kinds. In secured form student can receive the amount in the ranges of $ 1000 to $ 15000 and more for a period of 3 to 5 years and can repay this amount after finding a job in this mentioned period easily. In this way, these loans prove for students quite comfortable.

The lenders of unemployed student loans have their own different-different interest rate so; it is a duty of customer to make an inquiry about the interest rate. For making inquiry they can take the help of internet technique, which will help them a lot to find a good loan lender. Being a short term loan the interest rate is slightly higher.

In the United States of America, a very common feature is the charter schools. It is to be noted that while charter schools are a variant of public schools, there are certain essential differences. The charter schools are those which do not have to resort to the necessary rules and regulations that are essential for the public schools to follow in exchange of some form of liability by producing certain results which are codified in the school's charter. Charter schools are usually funded as well as founded by those who feel that the medium of education and imparting of knowledge within the stipulated boundaries of traditional public schools are not enough to determine the development of the child. In most cases, it is the activists, teachers, even parents and non profit organizations who usually join hands to lead the foundation of these charter schools. It is interesting to note that since these charter schools are excluded from any form of allegiance to the norms that guide the public schools, these usually function as autonomous organizations that set down their own codes of rule. Therefore, they can exercise a certain amount of flexibility in terms of their running of the charter schools. In terms of the syllabi and the teaching techniques incorporated by the charter schools, there is no form of restriction and they are free to experiment using newer and innovative techniques. However, all this relaxations have a single purpose which is laid down in the school's charter. The charter schools are required to prove their mettle and perform better than the traditional public schools.

The most important component with reference to the functioning of charter schools is the charter itself. The charter of the school consists of the programs, aims and rues and regulations that are considered to be of prime necessity by the school authorities. The charter schools are primarily answerable to a single authority which may be the state education authority, local school boards etc. The charter is issued by a chartering authority and this authority usually varies from state to state in the United States of America. While in some states it is the state education department which issues the charter, in some it may be local school district while non profit organizations may also be the chartering authorities. There are also certain for-profit organizations which act as the chartering authority. But evidences have proved that such fro-profit schools have in most cases failed to outshine the performance of the traditional public schools, despite receiving greater funds.

I doubt that anyone will disagree with me when I state that our society today in America is biblically illiterate. Specifically, I would define "biblically illiterate" as the following:

* Unfamiliar with the structure of the Bible. Most people could not explain why the Bible is split between Old and New Testaments. They cannot name the books of the Bible. That the books are grouped into certain categories is unknown to them. And, sadly, many people cannot even locate a verse of Scripture.

* Unfamiliar with the content of the Bible. Noah and Moses and Jesus are favorite stories, but are known only in the terms and generalities of childhood tales. The Psalms are at best pleasant poetry. The sermons of Jesus draw a blank. The Pauline and General Epistles are much too difficult to read and really aren't practical. The books of the Prophets are totally useless.

* Unfamiliar with the purpose of the Bible. The Bible is certainly not science, and even its history is suspect. At most it's a moral code, but even then, the vast majority of people haven't read it to know what moral code it contains - they quote the Golden Rule and think that's all Jesus ever said.

* Unfamiliar with the theology of the Bible. Words such as sin, salvation, sanctification, grace, justification, and redemption are archaisms completely out-of-touch with modern-day America. The concept that there are doctrines of God, man, Christ, and the Trinity is unheard of.

* Unfamiliar with the truth of the Bible. In a world of moral relativism and moral decay, the statement that there is absolute truth, revealed by the one True God, would be considered ridiculous, narrow-minded, and old-fashioned.

It is one thing, however, to state that our society is biblically illiterate. That is almost to be expected; after all, that is the "world" that we are in, but not of.

What would you say, though, if I were to assert that the Church in America is also biblically illiterate? And by "the Church" I mean the true Church: the children of God, saved and redeemed by the blood; not everyone who happens to inhabit a pew on a given Sunday morning.

Look back on our definition of "biblically illiterate." Unfamiliar with the structure of the Bible. Can most Christians talk knowledgeably about the reason for the Old and New Testaments? Find their way quickly around to locate a given text? Talk about the various types of books found in the Testaments?

Unfamiliar with the content of the Bible. More is known about content, undoubtedly, than in society at large, but ask yourself: How many Christians can quote or locate verses that they need without hesitation? Or paraphrase passages or verses of Scripture - even well known ones such as the Beatitudes or I Corinthians 13? If asked what would define the Christian walk, could they provide a clear answer? Are people comfortable defending their faith? Proving a point from Scripture? Leading someone to Christ with nothing more than a Bible in hand?

Unfamiliar with the purpose of the Bible. The Church does fairly well here, recognizing and affirming that the purpose of the Bible is to tell the story of man's sin and God's plan of salvation and how to live a holy life, but still - do we really live it? Do our lives show the world the importance of the Sacred Writ?

Unfamiliar with the theology of the Bible. We do all right with short words like sin and grace, but longer terms such as sanctification and justification still get glazed looks from many Christians. Certainly, the words seem to be detached from everyday life. We are content to admit that doctrine is important, but we relegate it to pastors and seminary students.

Unfamiliar with the truth of the Bible.  As Christians, we affirm that the Bible is the true and absolute standard of living, the only plan of salvation, and the answer to every question voiced by humankind. But if we don't know what it says, if we don't understand the doctrines, and if we can't tell people about it - then can we really say that that is what we believe?

In any battle, it is important to understand what we are fighting against. Christian education in all its forms - Sunday school, Bible studies, discipleship relationships, sermons, books, radio, etc. - is struggling against biblical illiteracy: in the church as well as in the world. Let's take the time to study our opponent so we can advance God's kingdom and win this war!

 

© 2008 Paula Marolewski

You have my permission to reprint and distribute this article as long as it is distributed in its entirety, including all links and copyright information. This article is not to be sold or included with anything that is sold.

 

While there are many forms of teaching in the Christian education arena, there are a few basic tenets that are applicable across the board. We will focus on these tenets as they apply to "formal" teaching (classroom, discussion, lecture, discipling relationships), but they are just as important in informal settings.

1. Set goals. This is probably the biggest omission for teachers. We know and want to communicate a lot of "stuff," but we haven't clearly defined our goal and purpose. Without a goal and purpose, our teaching wanders and we won't see the fulfillment the Lord intends in our ministries.

It may be helpful to choose a verse or passage to be a guide for your teaching. Then, as you prepare a lesson or a series of lessons, ask yourself questions to see if you are meeting your goals. For example, if we were looking at Ephesians 4:11-16, we might ask ourselves:





  • How am I equipping people to serve through this lesson?



  • How am I building up the body of Christ?



  • How am I succeeding as an example of Christ-like character? How am I failing?



  • What doctrines am I teaching on? How can I better communicate them?



  • What practical application will my hearers draw from my lesson?



  • What sin or error am I confronting?



  • What spiritual disciplines am I promoting? Am I demonstrating them in my own life?



  • How am I encouraging intimacy with God?



  • How am I exhorting people to love?



  • Is Christ the beginning, ending, and focus of my teaching?




Specific lessons and series of lessons will, of course, have additional specific goals particular to the topic at hand. These goals should be clearly delineated before teaching begins, and regular evaluations should take place to be certain that goals are being achieved.

2. Put forth effort. Give your preparation - and your delivery - the best of yourself. Don't expect fulfillment in ministry if you consistently "cobble something together" at the last minute, are rushing around the house to get out on time, and are tired when it's time to teach. You and your hearers will get the most out of your teaching if you put forth solid, concentrated effort into preparation time, and are rested and enthusiastic when it's time to speak.

3. Be orderly. Build a lesson as you would build a house. Lay a foundation and develop your points thoroughly and completely to a conclusion. You want your hearers to walk away with several things: facts, understanding, and application.

4. Avoid tangents. Whether they come from you or from one of your hearers, nip tangents in the bud (unless there is a distinct reason and the Spirit's leading to follow them and expand on them). Lessons should be tight, allowing no room for wandering or drifting. You will not accomplish your goals unless you stay focused. 

5. Combine orthodoxy and orthopraxy. Each lesson should contain both right teaching (orthodoxy) and instruction on right practice (orthopraxy). Doctrine in a vacuum will not be remembered or be seen as applicable. Guidance on right practice will not become ingrained unless the reasons and doctrines behind it are understood. Instruction on the Word of God and the walk of God should go hand-in-hand whenever we teach. 

6. Make it practical. Every lesson should be a "rubber-meets-the-road" lesson. If it's not practical, it won't be remembered. If it doesn't apply to life today, to my life today, then it's a waste of my time. Draw lessons from life today, and show how to apply lessons to life today.

7. Be dynamic. Whatever your teaching style, make it dynamic. Dynamic comes from the Greek word "dunamis," or power. Whether you lecture or lead discussions, whether you enjoy acting your lessons in front of a crowd or prefer quiet times in a circle, your teaching style should be power-filled through the Spirit. Be creative. Be compelling. Be challenging. Be excited. Be intense. However you speak, grab your hearers and hold them - only then will they hear what you're saying.

8. Encourage interaction. In almost all cases, people will learn more from a class that they participate in. Ask questions. Encourage responses and discussion. Be sure people are understanding what you're saying. Welcome input. Even a class that is predominantly lecture has room for learner participation. Frequently a question and answer time will serve to bring home the doctrines and lessons taught.

9. Repeat and review. You only remember a fraction of what you hear - so be sure your listeners hear what's most important many times. Review the key points of past lessons. Review points made earlier in a given lesson. Repeat truth until it becomes ingrained in your hearers.

10. Handouts and homework. Don't be afraid to ask your listeners to put forth effort on their own part. Give handouts with fill-ins and room for notes at each class - it encourages people to write down key points, therefore aiding the learning process (the more senses you engage in learning, the better you will remember). Give homework. Ask people to read and think and prepare for the next class, or to follow up on the one just given. Remind your hearers that Christian education does not happen for one hour on a Sunday - it must be a part of daily life.

11. Expect excellence. People will rise to your expectations of them. Never patronize or act condescendingly toward people. Don't give shallow or fluff-filled lessons. Dig deep into the truth and your listeners will fall in love with the truth, too.

12. Pray. Pray for yourself and your hearers. Pray for your preparation time, your sanctification, and your delivery. Pray for their attentiveness, understanding, and commitment to walk with the Lord. Pray for discernment, insight, and wisdom. Your ministry will only succeed if it is bathed in and founded on prayer.


© 2008 Paula Marolewski

You have my permission to reprint and distribute this article as long as it is distributed in its entirety, including all links and copyright information. This article is not to be sold or included with anything that is sold.

All too often, planning for Christian Education involves desperately flipping through the church directory and asking, "Who might be willing to take a class?"

Is it any wonder, then, that classes fall flat, attendance is poor, and results are non-existent?

Instead, we need to approach Christian Education with foresight and strategy, being certain to include these seven essentials:

1. Develop a balance of classes. The teaching body should be organized so as to teach a balance of classes at all times, and over the course of time, that complement and build on each other. For instance, balancing a doctrine-focused class with a practice-focused class, balancing topical studies with biblical book studies, balancing lecture-style with discussion-style classes, balancing basic studies with in-depth studies.

2. Mentor new teachers. New teachers should be intentionally and carefully mentored in their spiritual gift. All spiritual gifts require growth, education, and coaching - teaching is no exception. Mentoring should take place with an experienced teacher, in a safe environment, within a purposefully established relationship that allows for constructive critique and optimum growth.

3. Perform regular evaluations. It is imperative that each teacher evaluate him or herself on a regular basis with regard to personal holiness and effective ministry. Additionally, however, it is necessary that the teaching body as a whole evaluate itself with regard to their combined ministry to the church body, and whether or not as a whole they are upholding their calling and achieving their goals.

4. Choose topics with care. Subject matter should be chosen very carefully, taking three main points into consideration: first, what is a teacher's area of expertise and passion; second, what are the expressed needs and desires of the church body; and third, what is the Spirit's leading.

5. Provide diversity and opportunity. Encourage rotation among the teaching body so as to give all teachers opportunities to teach, and opportunities to rest. Such rotation also prevents "cliques" or "followings" from developing within the church body, and exposes the church to a variety of teaching styles, perspectives, insights, and subject matter.

6. Encourage discipleship. While not everyone feels comfortable or called to teach in front of people, we are all called to discipleship. Training should take place in this area, but in essence it is simple: encourage people to find someone they can learn from and someone they can help, and walk in those relationships. We all need to be learning from others, and passing on that which we learn. Such relationships will help make Christian Education a way of life for the church.

7. Be accountable. There should be clear leadership and accountability in the church among the teaching body. Such leadership will help balance classes, organize a teaching schedule, and oversee the corporate goals of the church.

With proper care, planning, and preparation in the area of Christian Education, we will see the Word of God go forth with power in our churches, and in each person's life!


© 2008 Paula Marolewski

You have my permission to reprint and distribute this article as long as it is distributed in its entirety, including all links and copyright information. This article is not to be sold or included with anything that is sold.

 

Why, in a culture where nearly everyone can read, has access to a Bible, and has a church on every corner, is there such biblical illiteracy? I believe the answer to this question is to be found springing from the society we are a part of:

First, there is a diminished stress on education. We see this in lowered national standards. Lowered expectations. Lowered requirements. We emphasize "feeling good" about yourself and therefore we accept mediocrity. Defining educational excellence and striving for it is old-fashioned and exclusionary.

Second, there is an emphasis on "rights" over "responsibility."  The phrases are so common they are cliched: "I deserve it." "It's my right." Whether or not we've "earned" it is irrelevant - because I want it, it's my "right."

Third, there is a lack of balance in our use of time. The latest handheld techno-gadgets have become our Bibles, traveling with us wherever we go, providing structure and order to our days, advising us of what we can and can't do. The thing they don't provide is balance, rest, prioritization, and peace. We have become multi-tasking people instead of single-focused persons.

Fourth, there is a "quick-fix" mentality. We live in a culture of sound-bites, immediate access, convenience technology, and instant gratification. We are unwilling to sweat and wait and work for what we want.

Think for a minute of how this cultural worldview plays itself out within the Church:

With our diminished stress on education, we are content with teaching the bare basics of the faith in our churches. We are so concerned that people will become "overwhelmed" or "frightened" by the harder truths of Scripture, or by an in-depth study of doctrine, that we don't present it to them. We keep them on a milk diet, and then wonder why they can't digest meat.

The cultural emphasis on "rights" means that we look at the benefits of Christianity ... answered prayer, spiritual gifts, leadership, etc. ... as our "rights" as children of God. The thought that the fullness of these things comes only through a life of obedience and daily discipline is unpalatable.

Our schedules show our lack of balance in our lives. How often do you have in your daily plan: "Quiet time." "Prayer time." "Weekend spiritual retreat." "Time for a long, quiet, unhurried walk - may take all afternoon." We have planned God right out of our lives. Instead of providing us more time to spend on our spiritual development, we have less, because we schedule the time we have down to the wire.

Finally, our quick-fix mentality has lost to us our entire Christian history of devotion, dedication, spiritual formation, solitude, labor, and suffering. We have no time to wait for what is good, and we don't have patience with pain. We will not tarry for wisdom, nor work for fulfillment. If maturity cannot be gained in five-minute easy-to-understand devotional readings, then it won't be gained at all.

Why are we biblically illiterate as the Church? The above points can be summarized neatly:





  • We do not stress education.



  • We do not stress responsibility.



  • We do not stress balance.



  • We do not stress perseverance.




Without these, biblical knowledge - and spiritual maturity - cannot be achieved.

© 2008 Paula Marolewski

You have my permission to reprint and distribute this article as long as it is distributed in its entirety, including all links and copyright information. This article is not to be sold or included with anything that is sold.

 

Recently, there has been an impetus to place for-profit performance-markers in the not-for-profit education sector. While everyone agrees that public money should only be spent on programs, initiatives, and teachers that produce results, finding an accurate and realistic means for measuring pedagogy has proved difficult.

The difficulty in finding a middle ground hasn't stopped the NCLB commission—led by Roy E. Barnes and Tommy Thompson—from suggesting that teachers and principals should be judged by their students' test scores. In addition, the NCLB commission suggested that the performance of specific students be tracked from year to year. In response to the aggressive means that the NCLB commission is seeking to place on higher education, Edward J. McElroy—president of the American Federation of Teachers—stated that: "there is no reliable assessment systems(s) to tie student achievement to teacher performance."1

Meanwhile in New York State, Eliot Spitzer and Manuel Rivera have carved out an additional $7 billion a year—which will boost the total yearly spend to $24.8 billion by 2010—for "performance based" school funding. In an effort to do away with the antiquated funding that New York State currently employs, each of the State's school districts are obligated to sign a "contract of excellence" in order to secure funding. The push towards a measurably pedagogic system provides the education system with more funding, while making superintendents, administrators, and teachers accountable.

In contrast to the tact that the NCLB commission has taken, Spitzer's approach to policy change and implementation has been more collaborative in nature: especially when compared with former Governor Pataki.

Commissioner of Education Richard P. Mills noted that Gov Spitzer delivered his speech in the education department building, included regents on his transition team, and invited board members to
help lead the charge for his agenda…. "He's offering a partnership. It's not always been like this," Mr Mills said. "He's giving us strong leadership. This is how it's done." 2

On a more global scale, the push towards performance-based education has been promoted as a means for maintaining the competitive work force, and the quality of life of the United States Of America. On December 14, 2006 the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce panel recommended that schools be operated by independent contractors, as well as giving states funding power, rather than local school districts. This panel is composed of New York City schools chancellor, Joel I. Klein; two former labor secretaries, William E. Brock, a Republican, and Ray Marshall, a Democrat; two former federal education secretaries, Rod Paige, a Republican, and Richard W. Riley, a Democrat and others. The panel's recommendation comes in the wake of many claims that the American workforce is becoming less competitive. The AFT executive vice president, Antonia Cortese, noted that the proposals had ''some seriously flawed ideas with faddish allure that won't produce better academic results .''3

Regardless of how we feel about performance based education initiatives, it is worth noting that the topic has garnered the attention of heavy-weight public figures from across the country. It is also worth noting that we've seen more performance-based education initiatives implemented in the past few years than in the previous decade. It remains to be seen how the country as a whole will move towards performance based education funding as a standard, rather than an idea.

-Sources
Jean Shecmo, Diana, "Tougher Standards Urged for Federal Education Law", The New York Times, February 14, 2007
McNeil, Michelle, "Reform Agenda" in New York, Education Week, February 7, 2007
Herszenhorn, David M., Expert Panel Proposes Far-Reaching Redesign of the American Education System, The New York Times, December 15th 2006K
Recently, there has been an impetus to place for-profit performance-markers in the not-for-profit education sector. While everyone agrees that public money should only be spent on programs, initiatives, and teachers that produce results, finding an accurate and realistic means for measuring pedagogy has proved difficult.

Cover letters can be written in different manners reiminding employers to choose for qualified applicants that are applying for a certain position in the company. Writing cover letters can be difficult yet these letter or business letters are required in the employment process. Likewise, there are different cover letter format that can be written especially with the education cover letter used in applying a position in the educational departments.

Different cover letters focuses on various information that are applicable to the applicants itself but an education cover letter however usually is more on the educational background of job seekers based on the experiences that applicants' consider will benefit in the choice of school or preferred companies they are applying for. Cover letters are essential part of the employment industries especially for people searching for an occupation through education. Besides, educational cover letters are perfect for applicant that hopes to become a part of the education career field. Education cover letters are usually for applicants who believe are qualified in the position of taking part in the educational department because education cover letters are more focused on the educational background and experiences achieved in the applicants' life.

Applicants interested in a career in education are required to submit a cover letter for the employers to gain knowledge of the applicants' abilities and skills that are believe to contribute in the company. Abilities and skills of the applicant should be in brief but formal manner giving impact on the employers reading while expanding their interest in getting to know more of the applicant. However, cover letters may not often attract the employer due to unexceptional flaws and incorrect grammar. Educational cover letters should be well-written, impressive and interesting while reading in order to have interest in the applicants' achievements and briefly state how one can contribute or gain by being a part of the company.

Writing an education cover letter is the same as writing a standard cover letter. It has the same format as with the standard cover letter but take note in education cover letters always include the applicants' informational background along with highlights of particular achievements based on the educational background that can contribute to the company applied for. Also, keep in mind that the letter should be brief and direct while on the process of writing an education cover letter. As mentioned, cover letters are given attention only if the applicant has an impressive letter that employers consider hiring the applicant.

Education cover letters are a form of business letter with a formal and overpowering vocabulary that are used by applicants complimenting their resumes by introducing their abilities and skills most important to the employers to learn about in a written business letter format. Applicants writing an education letter should consider highlighting certain areas of experiences that can benefit in the employers company while at the same time use the selling method in being hired or taken into the next level of employment procedures.

Making a perfect cover letter can really get you the position you desire. In fact, learning cover letter tips can help you write an impressive, formal business letter that will give impact to the reader. Cover letters all have one goal and that is to get the attention of the employer in making faster decision in hiring an applicant. In turn, an applicant will surely have positive results in their employment process.

School districts are required by federal law to pay for a large portion of special education programs and services.  These programs and services cannot be altered or cut in any way because it is federally mandated, unlike all other programs for the rest of the students. The short explanation is that federal law mandates it, as set forth in the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act  [20 USC 1400 et seq.].  This law, also called IDEA, enumerates the required needs for students with disabilities.  We all agree that students with special needs must be accommodated, additional care is necessary.  However, most of us do not know the details of the funding and spending on this issue.   In addition to the IDEA federal mandate, the State of California also sets forth special education funding apportionment in its Assembly Bill 602 SELPA [AB 602].
 
If you read these codes on its face and believe that the state and federal government will fund the programs as set forth in the requirements, then you're not alone.  Must of us assume that this mandated federal and state law will come from separate federal and state funds.  Most people who I asked assumed that special education is funded entirely by federal government disability funds.  It does make sense since it is a federally mandated requirement.  The state and federal statutes require schools to provide "free and appropriate public education" for special education students.   
 
Here is the shocking news, local school districts are responsible for this "free and appropriate public education."  In fact, IDEA section 1400(c)(6) cites that states and local education agencies are responsible for providing the education for students with disabilities, but that the Federal Government will have a role [emphasis added] in assisting the state and local education agencies.  
 
If you sample a school district's budget, you will find for example [PVPUSD] it receives $5,049M from the state [AB 602] in addition to the federal IDEA grant which is approximately $2M.  However, the actual costs for the special education programs in this district total approximately $22M.  This district has reported a deficit spending for special education in the sum of $12.5M which is almost double the amount it receives in funding from the federal government and state, combined.  This school district has to find and fund $12.5M in excess of the sum provided by the government funding. 
 
How could special education needs add up to such a colossal amount and cause such a deficit for local school districts? In the code, you will find that required programs such as one-on-one aids are mandatory for each qualifying special needs child. Transportation, specialized at-home care and a host of other services are also required under the law.  
 
I asked the California Department of Education why local school districts are not receiving more funding for special education requirements.  I asked how the local special education funding from the state is apportioned.  Becky Robinson of the CDE Special Education Department stated that "all funds, federal or state, must be approved by the governor."  I checked, she is right.  The Budget Act of 2008-2009 AB 1781 (chapter 268) sets forth the budget for special education as determined by the state budget and the governor. 
 
At a time when teachers and administrative staff are being laid off en masse, it is difficult to understand why school districts are forced to spend an additional $12.5M on special education program requirements, when state budget cuts are forcing school districts to cut teachers and programs elsewhere.  $12.5M could solve all of the local budget woes and keep the teaching and administrative staff employed for the benefit of the entire school.  The answer is that special education programs are depleting the school districts' budgets as administrators make cuts to prioritize the federally mandated programs for special education. 
 
Another item for budget in the statute that I should mention, is the special needs education conflict and dispute resolution.  There are law firms that specialize in representing students with disabilities and negotiate the settlement for district's alleged failure to comply with the established statutes and regulations under the federally mandated IDEA.  This means that the statutes for special education inherently set forth guidelines for legal action following administrative proceedings should a parent identify a violation of their child's "free and appropriate public education." 
 
Many school districts have greatly suffered from lawsuits brought by parents who claim that their special needs child's rights were not met under the code.  Case in point, Porter v. Board of Trustees of Manhattan Beach Unified School District et al., 307 F. 3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2002), 537 U.S. 1194, 123 S. Ct. 1303, 154 L. Ed. 2nd 1029 (2003). 

In the case of Porter, the parents of a student, who had been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, charged that  Manhattan Beach Unified School District failed to provide their child with a "free appropriate public education."   This lawsuit resulted in the school district paying over $6.7M to the family of the student.  In addition, as part of the settlement, control of the student's education was transferred to a Special Master, Ivor Weiner, Ph.D., resulting in the cost of just under $1.1M to pay for the education of the student at the direction of the Special Master. 

The problem is that whether or not this school district properly complied with the federally mandated programs and services for this student, the school district was forced to make cuts elsewhere to pay for this legal settlement.   Why has the federal government mandated such broad standards for special education and then leave local school districts to oversee, manage and fund these programs? 

Since the subject of budgets and special education is not a topic that people are willing to discuss, reform in this regard is unlikely.  Certainly, special education programs and services are not to blame for this problem.  This problem belongs squarely on the lap of the federal government under the mandated IDEA laws.   

How will the master online special education degree equip those teachers who want to make a difference? The answer is straightforward - in the USA, currently there are over 6 million students who have enrolled in these special programs.

While schools - public and private, preschool to secondary - struggle to identify and deploy qualified teachers to address these 6 million students, nobody knows for sure how many million students more need to be identified for special classes, so that they can better cope with their learning disabilities, or physical and mental handicaps.

At the same time, successive Federal and State Administrations since 1975 have sharpened their focus on creating complex systems for identifying, formulating, and delivering a highly-individualized education program to each eligible student. The cornerstone of these legislations, programs, and licensures is the highly qualified teacher.

A Master's degree in has thus become a must for aspiring teachers, and with many of them already employed as regular teachers, master online special education degree has become the most convenient route to this profession.

What It Involves

Master online special education degree involves distance or online learning that leads to graduate degrees like Master of Education (MEd), Master of Science (MS), Master of Arts (MA), or any of the specialized master's degrees in various sub-domains, such as dyslexia, attention-deficit, etc.

Master online special education degree courses will last upwards of one year, and might involve significant on-the-job training under an experienced special educator. Most states also require that aspiring teachers pass a licensure test, before starting their career.

Why Special Education?

On an average, teachers in this field don't earn much more than regular teachers. On the other hand, the job responsibilities of these teachers are more demanding - they can even include defending oneself and the school's program in court, if dissatisfied parents of challenged students opt for litigation, as has happened numerous times in various states!

Still, about 450,000 educators have opted for and currently work as special education teachers in the country. What must be the attraction?

Teachers in this field are very unlikely to encounter unemployment in the short-term or long-term. But that alone can't be the lure to enter this profession, where sheer hard work, difficult coordination between many, and uncertain outcomes from the part of students, make life stressful.

The answer can, hence, be only that there are hundreds of thousands of teachers out there who want to make a genuine difference to the lives of these challenged students. And it is indeed a huge difference. According to estimates, four in five challenged students used to be excluded from the US education system, as near as three decades back. Official figures, tabulated around 1975, put this at 1 million students, who missed the bus.

Why Master Special Education Degree?

Teachers in this specialty are still in significant short supply. Because of this, some states have still not made it mandatory for them to have a master's degree. In such states, bachelor's degree holders appear for professional licensure exams and work as special education teachers.

However, more and more states are opting for a master's degree as the minimum qualification, for a simple reason. A special ed. teacher should be capable of interacting effectively with professionals like psychologists, disability therapists, educational evaluators, educational lawyers, supervisors from the school district, regular teachers, and, of course parents of disabled students. It takes a master's degree holder with significant on-the-job training to confidently undertake this.

Master's degree holders in this field have also another booming avenue - they can work as instructors in colleges and universities that deliver specialized programs, and these institutions are rapidly increasing in number. They are also eligible to work as supervisors or administrators in the school districts.

A small but significant proportion of educators go for ' degree, so as to progress to doctoral degrees, which are also offered by more and more universities, these days.

Lastly, though special education teachers don't earn much more than regular teachers on an average, the highest salaries drawn by special educators exceed the highest salaries drawn by regular teachers by $3,000 to $8,000. It goes without saying that almost all of those highest paid special educators are master's degree holders.

Why Master Online Special Education Degree?

Those planning to take a master's degree in this field are almost always regular teachers who have developed a fascination for this field. Others include psychologists, counselors, learning disability therapists, etc. Since both teachers and these professionals already hold full time jobs, it is a master online special education degree that is more suitable to them.

Secondly, only an exceptionally good regular teacher can hope to be an effective teacher of special students. Because of this, aspirants enter the regular teaching profession to garner some years of experience before attempting to study special ed. Master online special education degree perfectly fits this scheme.

Thirdly, a significant component of any education master's degree is on-the-job training in a special school or a regular school's special education department. Those working teachers who opt for a master online degree can thus modify their school work itself for the on-the-job training part.

Where to Study Master Online Special Education Degree?

Hundreds of universities and colleges across the country offer master online degrees in special ed. They include state or public universities, and private or independent universities. Some of the courses have small components that require occasional campus visits, while almost all require on-the-job training at a school.

Working teachers who opt for master online special education degree generally prefer studying in their own state, if not their city. Another reason for local preference is that some universities incorporate that state's licensure requirements as part of the course. Due to strict licensure requirements, it is also important to go for an accredited course.

State or Public Universities Offering Master Online Special Education Degree

At least 12 state university systems offer master online degree in special ed. They include Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Aspirants in states like Alabama, Florida, and Kansas, are especially fortunate, with multiple public universities offering the course. Florida perhaps tops the nation with its three public universities offering this degree. Some of the prestigious state universities offering the course across the nation are:

ALABAMA: Auburn University, Auburn, University of South Alabama, Mobile
FLORIDA: Florida State University, University of Central Florida, University of West Florida
INDIANA: Ball State University
KANSAS: Emporia State University, Fort Hays State University
KENTUCKY: University of Louisville, Louisville
MICHIGAN: University of Michigan, Dearborn
MISSOURI: University of Missouri, Columbia
NEBRASKA: University of Nebraska, Lincoln
NEW JERSEY: New Jersey City University
NORTH CAROLINA: University of North Carolina
PENNSYLVANIA: Clarion University of Pennsylvania
TEXAS: Texas Tech University

Private or Independent Universities Offering Online Degrees

At least 10 well-known private or independent universities in 8 states offer master online special education degree. These states include Arizona, California, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington. Arizona and Iowa top the list with two private universities each, offering the course. Florida and Pennsylvania are perhaps the only two states that have both public and private universities offering the course. Some of the well-known private schools offering online degrees are:

ARIZONA: Grand Canyon University, University of Phoenix
CALIFORNIA: La Sierra University
FLORIDA: Nova Southeastern University
IOWA: Graceland University, Kaplan University
MINNESOTA: Bethel University
VIRGINIA: Regent University
WASHINGTON: City University

What to Expect From Master Online Special Education Degree, in the Future?

The high performance expected from special edd teachers will ensure that a master's degree in this field becomes an absolute must in all states. As it is working teachers who are more likely to go for a master's degree in this subject, and because the course itself is dominated by on-the-job training, college degree master online might even upstage regular courses in the subject, in the near future.

Recent stricter regulations from the part of administrations regarding expected student performance, and better awareness about learning disabilities from the part of parents, will make sure that more and more students will be presented for evaluation. This scenario will drive the demand for qualified and trained special educators, giving further momentum to master online special ed. degree courses.

The most likely change in course content will be super-specializations in special education, with probably different master's degrees built around different learning disabilities or handicaps.

A Concise History of Education of Teachers, of Teacher Training and Teaching

(ptint version of author's site www.geocities.com/histedu

Western history of teacher training, education history, teaching theories, education of teachers, modern history od education, began in early 18th century Germany: teaching seminaries educating teachers were the first formal teacher training in Western history of education and teaching.

(History of education had 2nd century-BC Greek Spartan free public education, Athenian Academy until age 18 and higher Academy and Lyceum; Roman private formal schooling in tiers; China's 1st century-BC administrator examinations; 1st century Jewish informal Cul' Tura general education; Islam's 9th century universities [madrasahs]; 16th century Aztec mandatory teen education; 18th century Russian nation-wide education, Poland's Education Ministry, Chez 'teacher of nations' Comenius's 'Didactica Magna' on universal education [compulsory, certified teachers, tests]; leading later Western history of education –17th century Scotland's free education, 18th's Norway's mandatory literacy and  New Zealand's standard education, 21st's Europe's Bologna process equalising educational qualifications.)

Teacher education and training, first teacher training college in French  history of education and history of teaching, Jean Babtiste de la Salle's 18th century Brothers of the Christian schools, had non-clerical male teachers teaching poor and middle class children. Based on Greek philosophers' philosophy of education and teaching, re-introduced by Islam, spirituality was not its only reason, basis of education. Teacher education and training had been clerical –this was Western history of education's first secular teacher training college.

This philosophy of education changed educational history's attitude to education. It reformed education, educational theory, learning, enabled further education reforms and educational theories of teaching in history of education. With education reforms in education history, educational theory of teacher education required of teachers an understanding of the human mind and the theory of education, knowledge of sciences and arts, principles and educational methods of teaching. This need in educational history for a teaching method, method of education, necessitated theories of education -in Western history of education educational theories on teacher education interested educators.

These educational philosophies and theories of education on teacher education became the norm in Western history of education, teacher training establishments first Normal Schools in the history of education and training of teachers.

Teacher education progressed educational history: in history of education and history of teaching the system of education required and enabled knowledge, in-service experience, certification for teachers, continuing professional development for teachers in teaching. This non-uniform system of teacher education and training enabled teachers, while teaching, at teacher seminars to refresh and increase their knowledge of theory of education and method of teaching -exchanging ideas among teachers.

Napoleon, in history of education and teacher training,  uniformed professional teaching. Adopting Germany's teacher seminars, in French history of education and in Western history of education and training of teachers, established the first uniform teacher education system.

Neither the USA's educational history nor British history of education did in educational philosophies, systems of education, include formal teacher education and training, although Elizabeth-I had introduced teachers' moral teaching fitness certification in teacher education .

In England's history of education and teaching, in early 19th century Joseph Lancaster and Andrew Bell founded the Lancastarian teaching method of teacher training: in a monitorial system of teacher education and training senior students ('monitors') receiving teaching from tutors were teaching junior students, acting as teachers.

In Scotland's history of education and teaching, 17th century free education compulsory in late 19th, Germany's teacher education and training influenced David Stowe's founding the Glasgow Normal Seminary for teachers.

Progress in teaching and teacher training began with Horace Mann's Massachusetts Normal Schools in the USA's educational history, and in Britain's history of education by the churches' and voluntary organisations' teacher training colleges and teaching the colonials.

In philosophies of education arguments followed on teacher education in educational history: should persons of lower English social class attend teacher training colleges and give teaching to children of higher social class!? Might teachers' teaching not influence young French minds with liberal ideas?!

(Japan's educational philosophy [perhaps influencing the USA's educational philosophy, history of education and teaching] emphasised patriotic teacher education and teaching.)

In Europe's history of teacher education and training, Rosencrantz's 19th century 'Philosophy of Education' emphasised 'philosophical and psychological data'; this, resembling Islam's university faculties, developed into separate teaching disciplines.

In Sweden's history of education and teaching, Pestalozzi furthered the progress of systems of education, advocating formal teacher training colleges.

(Pestalozzi, except theologically, was self-educated, did not leave a written account of teaching and of teacher training colleges; his place in the history of education and teaching is deducible in outline from his various writings, loving sincere deeds, the example he set.)

Germany's Froebel, and Alexander Bain's 'Education as a Science', favoured education of teachers through teacher training colleges; teacher education adopted what philosophies of education in Western educational history and teaching had lacked -Herbart's pedagogical emphasis in teaching on five formal steps: preparation, presentation, comparison, generalisation, application.

Germany's teacher education and training became the basis of developments in the history of education and teacher training; Derwent Coleridge and James Kay Shuttleworth in Britain, Mann in the USA broadly agreed: teacher education and training should emphasise techniques of teaching -"not only the subjects of instructions, but also the method of teaching".

Jules Ferry laws' compulsory education established teacher education and training in late 19th century French history of education: teacher education and training, by law, should be through formal teacher training colleges.

English speaking countries' history of education and teaching, formal teacher education and training, began with the University of Edinburgh's creating a chair in education, with St. Andrews; in the USA's history of education, e.g., Henry Bernard, Nicholas Murray Butler, followed.

In Western history of education, England's progress involved pedagogy and Herbart Sepencer's teaching techniques in teacher education and training, the USA's e.g., Francis W. Parker's, studying Germany's pedagogical teacher education developments.

In the USA's history of education and teaching the Darwinian hypothesis (as before later scientific evaluation) influenced John Dewey at the University of Chicago Laboratory Schools; taking into account from other disciplines what were considered relevant in teaching to child development, Brown University founded an education department.

(The La Salle College in Philadelphia, had been teaching education.)

New York's Teachers College, founded 1888, was incorporated into the Columbia University, 1893, establishing its teacher training college, announcing: "The purpose of the Teacher Training College is to afford opportunity, both theoretical and practical, for the training of teachers, of both sexes, for kindergartens and elementary schools and secondary schools, of principals, supervisors, and superintendents of schools, and of specialists in various branches of school work, involving normal schools and colleges" -it became the basis, in Western history of education and teaching, of teacher education and training and Teacher Colleges.

(The USA's educational history experts' versions vary on it history of education.) 

In most of British Commonwealth's history of education and system of teacher training, entry into teacher training came to require senior secondary education at High School level or British Grammar School education with national Matriculation or Ordinary and Advanced General Certificate of Education (GCE) examinations –or equivalent.

In Europe's history of education and teacher training, education with similar Gymnasium(/Abitur)  or General Lycè e Diploma, or equivalent education, became professional teacher education and training entry qualification.

(In British history of education, until early 20th century, holders of those qualifications, by selection examination, could become temporary teachers. Oxbridge graduates could register 'master' and be syndicated teachers. Other universities' graduates, to become teachers, attended teacher training colleges [if Bachelor of Education, second year teacher training of a teacher training college].)

In British Commonwealth's history of education greater importance was attached to professionalism in teacher education and training: academic qualifications did not suffice for teaching; teacher examinations required specific periods of specifically professional study in teaching. Professional teaching involved two years' professional study in teaching and additional in-house teacher training before professional teacher status. Professional teachers could, with another educational year at the teacher training college, specialise in a subject, e.g., geography or history (in farming colonies, e.g., Cyprus where Agriculture became a secondary school examination subject,  with one or two more educational years' through the Teacher Training College's Rural Agricultural School). Science graduates without professional teaching training and education qualified for permanent teaching after a year's classroom teaching experience approved by professionally qualified headmasters, as teachers of their subjects. Teachers were expected to attend teachers' seminars as continuing professional development.

While professional qualifications are regarded for professional reasons equivalent to doctorates in their counterparts and what qualify for teaching, teacher education and training (school age becoming lower and years less, to enable maturer teachers and teaching), for professional teaching knowledge and skills acquired at teacher training colleges, favoured bachelor degrees with teaching content emphasising skills over theory and, e.g., the USA's academic 'first professional degree' –more for research than professional practice.

(British history of education desired teaching with Post-graduate Certificate in Education [PGCE] -for English state school teaching Qualified Teacher Status [QTS] skills test, and [also if Bachelor of Education] successfully completing an induction year [in Scotland two] in school teaching as Newly Qualified Teacher [NQT], with continuing professional development; alternatively a specific teaching degree or on-the-job teacher training. Teachers trained at Teacher Training Colleges in [former] colonies –and similarly trained teachers with GCSE [grade C] or equivalent in English and Mathematics [for primary school teaching, also Physics] enjoy Qualified Teacher Status.)

(Canada's provinces or schools certify teachers; Australia requires none for federally funded private schools; France's is college/bachelor and Teacher Institute [master's -2010].)

{In the USA's history of education, until 1960s, one year's teacher training college education was required for teacher certification. In 1984 an alternate teaching route was introduced: bachelor's with teaching preparation and within a specified number of years completing a teaching or content based master's. (Some universities award [with summer study] bachelor degrees in two years, some two bachelor degrees simultaneously [e.g., with two arts and two science majors both BA Philosophy and BS ChE Chemical Engineering]; the  doctoral JD is pre-requisite to master's LL.M which not all tenured professors need posses.) The 'Master of Professional Studies' (MPS) First Professional Degree is academic, not professional. Many states require of teachers, for permanent teaching, examinations in pedagogy and a content area or general knowledge accredited by many private associations' varying standards; in early 21st century Marlboro-Carolina 20% of teachers had no certification.}

In educational history post general education having been academic for career advancement and scholarly activity or research, or professional for actual practice in the filed, the professional qualification is normally the terminating qualification; in professional teaching, advanced professional degrees enabling specialised teaching, e.g., at universities, are not regarded as part of professional teacher education and training for general education teaching; the USA's main master's area is for Ed.D or Ph.D. –research.)

In European history of education, teaching related educational leadership gained importance at the end of 20th century. Desiring the benefits of learnable leadership skills and inherent personal leadership qualities, teachers' educational leadership skills in teaching leadership are remunerated according to national teacher pay scales.

The USA's educational leadership teachers' pay is non-uniform; educational leadership skills standards vary. Graduate educational leadership programs are in, e.g., community issues and educational law. Private Teacher Advancement Programmes (TAP) subscribed by some schools encourage teachers in administrative or teaching development: a teacher prepares an individual growth plan (IGP) with an educational goal or teaching activity, or a cluster group of teachers identify a student learning need, becoming 'mentor' or 'master teacher'/'teacher of teachers'.

As others', USA's teacher training colleges' comparable teaching qualifications enjoy international regard.

In their history of education, having less aspired to 'practical' general education as in the USA and 21st century Britain, most British Commonwealth and European teaching institutions almost uniformly value widely academic general education as culture not acquirable in post general education (e.g., an opposition leader to a Prime Minister [both lawyers] "I as a Grammar School boy" [would not take 'that' from him who was not]) and Britain's suggestion to equate practical skills certificates with general academic qualifications was criticised.

(Early 21st century British educational history saw [university or equivalent  mandatory student grants becoming loans, unemployment necessitating longer and more courses, foreigners scoring higher in English] no increase since late 20th in literacy.)

(In the USA's history of education, with 20% adult functional illiteracy, as the educationists' concerns grew, the educationalists considered Europe's baccalaureate system of education; with growing public interest in education, at the end of 20th century a state appointed three generals to improve the standards of teaching and education and at the beginning of 21st century a general was appointed to federally improve teaching and educational standards.)

In educational history interest in the teaching profession has been based on the status of teachers. Regard for teachers in late 20th century was highest in Russia where teachers enjoyed better employment terms than elsewhere.

(In Britain's history of education, 1980s' miss-projection of numbers of teachers needed necessitated engaging science graduates without teaching qualifications as teachers; but a status was enjoyed by teachers of regard as in Europe, and, about the end of 20th century, knighthood for long serving teachers was suggested –due to controversy over peerages it did not materialise. At the beginning of 21st century reducing undergraduate degrees to two years with vocational content was considered, with master's for teachers -also non-major professional qualifications being above undergraduate degrees in National Vocational Qualifications; but Teachers' status was regarded to have been equated for economical reasons to classroom assistants' socially criticised for taking classes without professional teacher education and training.])

In the USA's history of education, teaching has hailed a form of essentialism in education, with a culture of practicality and model citizenry, emphasising respect for authority (advocated also for 21st century British education); with no general minimum standard in teacher training and education, some states not recognising the teaching qualifications of some others, teachers and teaching appear officially to enjoy no higher regard then Bernard Shaw's remark (about writers) "Those who can, do; those who can not, teach".

(In the USA, e.g., some teachers paid only term time having to seek vacation work, teaching and teachers generally are regarded to have enjoyed less good terms and conditions than elsewhere in proportion to social regard and public resources.)

The growth of interest in culture and education in Western history of teaching has been seen in the European Union, e.g., in Cyprus with the popularisation of education in mid. 20th century -reportedly with highest percentage of university graduates by 21st.

In Western educational reforms spiritual values in education are protected by teaching religious studies in schools in American secularism (protection of religion from political influence) and by the religious affiliations of many universities; in European secularism (protecting against one's formal dominance of the other), often with a state religion enshrined in the constitution, this is ensured by, e.g., Britain's Education Acts' requirement in compulsory education of religious worship by pupils at least once a month and, while British universities are not formally religiously affiliated, the availability of  chapels and chaplains to students at universities.

While preferences in education (e.g., the pedagogy based Steiner-Waldorf education for creating free moral and integrated individuals -its teachers' and schools' say on defining the curricula by some disagreed with, or Montessori's pre-school and elementary school child's self directed activities with auto-didactic equipment -regarded by some as risking raising obedient automatons), and  emphasis (be it practical skills or Emerson's 'thinking man'), have all had praise and criticism in the history of education and teaching and arguments continue on pragmatism and creation -v- evolution, generally Socrates's argument that the rightly trained mind turns toward virtue carries weight in most educational systems. Basically, in every history of education, an important aim of education and the societies' all time expectations have been on the lines of these verses (by the Cypriot teacher, the late Orhan Seyfi Ari):

" 'I was an ape' you say -or amphibian?
And now?! Are you not now.. 'man'!? "

The cultural values balance have been more reflected in the education and training of teachers in Western history of education and teaching and the status of teachers in Europe mostly in Spain, Italy and France where, without much disregard to spiritual values, school teachers' political and ideological affiliations have been the norm in professional teaching. 

The web site may interest on teacher the late Orhan Seyfi Ari at www.geocities.com/eoa_uk

Criminal background checks were an unexpected requirement for Andrew A. Zucker when he agreed to present an employment history. Zucker was not doing the usual work at the pentagon, not even taking out the trash. However, he was to learn how to implement the best teaching skills for middle school students. He was surprised at the numeral prerequisites to be provided.

When asked of his opinion on the matter, he stated that personally, for him, its shocking. Dr. Zucker was, at the time, working as a contractor conducting studies for the Education Department. He is no longer employed for the same department.

The Department of Education has been screening different employees such as Dr. Zucker, investigating with a background check involving a certain level of security for people accessing information of a sensitive class. One of the members of the Department of Education, spokeswoman Katherine McLane, stated that background checks of such extent must be allowed because of the sensitive information being worked with. This includes things such as names and social security numbers of the college students or candidates.

The question at hand was if the background checks as a method of employment screening was invading a right to privacy. One of 100 employees of the department submitted a letter protesting the extensive investigation involving medical and financial records. This was signed by the researchers stating that it was far more information than needed towards Margaret Spellings, the secretary of education.

Read more

Recent Posts